Photography Classes Online – Icon Photography School › Forums › Photography Lessons › Lesson 2 › Lesson 2 – Kirk
- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 4 months ago by
Duncan Rawlinson.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 16, 2011 at 1:09 pm #18340
Kirk
ParticipantOk, here is my submission for assignment two. Hope you enjoy my artist!
April 16, 2011 at 1:21 pm #20204Kirk
ParticipantOops, thought we could upload a doc…. Here is my submission:
When I was in high school I loved to draw and I was certain that I would end up going into the arts. However, due to some life events, I fell away from that passion and ended up going into computers. To this day however, I still love art and more specifically, artists that can capture extraordinary detail in their work. Maybe that’s what has drawn me to photography… detail.
While deciding on an artist for this assignment I had to choose a painter, not a photographer. This is because it was a specific painter that captured my attention as a teenager and amazed me with the talent he must have to create his works. Chuck Close is simply exceptional and no one can capture detail better.
It seems to me that any photographer would naturally be drawn to Chuck Close. His portraits reveal camera-like detail but he uses oil paint, not lenses, f-stops or shutter speeds. The emotion, flaws, atmosphere and beauty that are so important to a good portrait photograph are present in a Close painting. In fact, the school of art that Close represented was called Photorealism.So what painting grabbed my attention and led me to an obsession with detail and realism; Close’s “Big Self-Portrait”. This painting is incredible, he reveals every detail and managed to do this by using a fairly monochromatic color pallet. I was actually introduced to the painter in a high school art history class. Typically, I had a hard time staying awake because the teacher was so boring. However, when the slide came up with this particular image, my attention was focused and I was hooked.
Close takes photographs, in the 60’s he typically used Polaroids, and grids them using a technique that has been used since the Renaissance. He then takes the image and transfers it to canvas block by block using paint. I still get amazed by how he can manipulate such a limited color selection. It’s almost in complete gray-scale and he achieves the same tonal ranges we struggle to get in a good black and white photograph. Even Ansel Adams would be envious.
Aside from from his manipulation of color, or lack there of, you cannot help but be amazed by the detail he reveals. In “Big Self-Portrait” you can see reflections on his glasses, skin flaws, individual strands of hair and even smoke from the cigarette that dangles precariously from his mouth.
Finally, aside from the detail and ability to manipulate color, what amazes me is Close’s patience. His paintings can take months or even years to complete. As photographers, we are often blessed with a great photo in less than a second. However, I feel I can learn from Close. If I demonstrate patience with my photography, I can get the “exact” shot I want to create. You don’t get great photos by being impatient, you get lucky. Great photos take time to think out and compose, just like great paintings.
April 16, 2011 at 9:05 pm #20205Duncan Rawlinson
KeymasterHi Kirk!
Thanks for writing up this assignment. You’ve done very well.
I too share your love for ridiculous levels of detail. So much so that I’m seriously considering getting one of these behemoths.
I have this sinking feeling that the images I’m shooting now just won’t cut the mustard 20 years from now in terms of resolution and quality.
In fact I wrote a little bit about that here.
You should take a look at GigaPan.org
In terms of photorealism you have to tip your had to artists with the patience and the energy who spend that much time creating one image.
I have to disagree with your notion about how it takes a second to create a great photograph though. From my perspective I think every image is the culmination of all of your previous work and expeience. To create a truly masterful image it will take years and years of practice. So in that sense it’s not just a second to create a stunning photography. I understand what you mean though, the action of creating the photo takes a fraction of a second!
If you’re concerned about getting maximum detail in your images you’ll want to do a few things. Obviously you’ll want to retain optimum focus. Many times this involves using a tripod and taking your photos seriously. It means breaking out your tripod in weird places and being ‘that guy’…
I have attached a higher resolution of the piece of art you mentioned by Chuck Close so that other students can learn from the detail and the focus of this work:
[attachment=0:2v0yorlr]chuck-close-big-self-portrait-painting.jpg[/attachment:2v0yorlr]
Nice work here Kirk!
I hope this helps your clarify your area of interest in photography and gets you inspired to get out and keep shooting!
Also I responded to your note about which lens to use on the ‘which camera do you use’ thread.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.