hard and soft lighting

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #17813
    ekshtein
    Participant

    Those are mine 2 pictures. 馃檮

    #19246
    Duncan Rawlinson
    Keymaster

    Great work on both the lighting and composition of both of these photographs.

    Let鈥檚 look at each photograph individually. Your first photograph has very dramatic composition. The bar that acts as a leading line, drawing the audience鈥檚 eyes into the frame is a great way not only to direct attention, but also to use diagonal lines to create drama. Not only that, but because of the way you鈥檝e used the bar as both a foreground and middle ground object you鈥檝e also create a sense of dimension which helps give a sense of reality and depth to the photograph.

    You鈥檝e also used a shallow depth of field to further the illusion of depth in a 2 dimensional space and helped enhance the illusion of 3 dimensions. Great work on this shot.

    In your second shot you鈥檝e also used a shallow depth of field and generally good composition. However, with this shot I feel there is more room for improvement in the composition.

    For starters, the lighting isn鈥檛 that hard. Although it鈥檚 sunny out, the lighting is hitting your subject very softly, it could be caused by shade, shadows or soft directional lighting, but there is no contrast in the highlights or dark shadows. Look at the following hard light portrait to get and idea of the difference.

    http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b276/bluesky93/08-28-2005/IMG_8268_BW_R.jpg

    Secondly, there is some distracting amputations (cutting off) of secondary objects on the left side of the frame. Although you鈥檝e used a shallow depth of field, which makes it a little less distracting, the object is still in focus enough that the inclusion of the partial object is seen as misplaced or accidental. I can鈥檛 identify the object and therefore it doesn鈥檛 really add to you visual story.

    My last point isn鈥檛 a criticism, but it鈥檚 something to be aware of. You鈥檒l find with a lot of portraits eyes are generally not located in the center. They are generally located in the upper 2/3rds of the shot. You鈥檒l also notice this is films. The eyes are generally not in the center of the frame. It鈥檚 not wrong to place them in the center of the frame (in fact, my example of hard lighting above, the eyes are in the center and I think that鈥檚 a good shot), but the point is to be aware of the visual difference. Centered eyes are often seen as too balanced and risk having awkward composition. On the other hand eyes located 2/3rds of the way up a frame look as follows:

    http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2201/2378683459_33eb84cc03.jpg?v=0

    Other than that, great work!

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.